We read SAM.gov, SBIR.gov, and Grants.gov so you don’t. Each topic is scored 1–10 against your capability statement with a short rationale. ITAR, CUI, and classified notices are filtered out before you see them.
No credit card. First two weekly digests free. Unsubscribe with one click.
Most small R&D shops have one engineer skimming federal solicitations. It’s the worst use of senior time, and the good topics close before they surface.
Reading every new SAM.gov, SBIR.gov, and Grants.gov posting hoping to find the two or three that matter.
Open windows are often 30 days. Generic keyword alerts surface them too late and too noisily.
One controlled notice forwarded to the wrong subcontractor is a problem. We strip those before the digest leaves our servers.
Two minutes to set up. Two minutes to read each Friday.
One PDF, one paragraph, or a link to your website — whatever you already have. We turn it into the matching profile.
New topics get hard-filtered for ITAR / CUI / classified, then scored against your profile by a Claude classifier with a written rationale per topic.
Ranked, deduped, with deadlines and direct links. Two minutes of reading replaces a half-day of browsing.
Run against the public capability statement of a NIH-funded regenerative-biomaterials firm. The classifier scored six solicitations; three are shown.
Your injectable, percutaneously delivered, biodegradable bone adhesive matches every enumerated requirement: fatigue over PMMA, bioactive regeneration, fluoroscopic-compatible delivery, and large-animal preclinical data. Gap: the topic asks for IND-enabling toxicology; your current biocompatibility package targets IDE — confirm whether existing data clears the NIAMS bar before committing.
PRORP’s call for “bone-adhesive biomaterials with image-guided percutaneous delivery and prior preclinical evidence of regenerative bone-remodeling” maps one-to-one onto your osteoconductive injectable adhesive. Deal-breaker to watch: 510(k) or De Novo plan required at submission — your NIH path is IDE/PMA; the regulatory narrative needs reconciling.
Your bioresorbable osteoconductive adhesive fits NIA’s call for materials that improve “long-term bone remodeling in age-related VCF.” Gap: STTR requires a formal university subaward — your existing academic collaborators in regenerative biomaterials would be the natural anchor (STTR rules require the subaward go to a research institution, not a CRO).
First month free. No card up front. Cancel any time.
SAM.gov alerts are keyword filters — they send every notice that contains “machine learning” whether the topic fits your shop or not, and they don’t rank or filter ITAR. We read each topic and score it against your specific capability statement.
Yes — SBIR and STTR from all twelve participating agencies (DoD, NIH, NASA, DOE, NSF, USDA, DHS, ED, DOT, EPA, NOAA, HHS). STTR-specific topics are tagged in the digest.
If you sign up today with your capability statement, your first digest goes out the next Friday. There’s no onboarding bottleneck on our end.
Yes — the first two weekly digests are free, no card required. If they’re not useful, you simply don’t subscribe.
The public SAM.gov Opportunities API, the SBIR.gov topic feed, and the Grants.gov daily XML extract — all refreshed daily. We don’t scrape and we don’t republish full solicitation text. Just titles, deadlines, agencies, and our per-topic rationale.
An independent engineer, not a venture-backed team. The pipeline is one operator and Claude; emails get answered the same day. Reach me at jcavallo@alumni.colgate.edu.
Drop your email. Send us your capability statement when you reply to the confirmation. First Friday digest goes out the next week.
No card. Two free digests. Unsubscribe with one click.